I’ve been debating for a while. Should I post a picture of myself on my blog? There are some good things and some bad things with putting a face to the name. While I feel my scrolling girl over on the right is a fairly accurate representation of myself, I know some people might be curious of how I look IRL. So, if anyone reads my blog - what do you think? Or does it even matter to you at all what I look like?
January 15th, 2005 at 2:57 pm
doesn’t matter, of course, but I’d still love to see a pic.
January 16th, 2005 at 2:01 pm
I wouldn’t mind seeing a picture of you … but then, I haven’t posted one either.
If you say the scrolling girl looks like you, it’s good enough for me.
Okay; where did you get the “stay up to date on comments” thing?
January 16th, 2005 at 2:17 pm
I can understand why you haven’t posted one to your blog b/c it’s more of an informational blog (great one BTW), but since mine is such a personal one, I question whether or not those who visit should see a face.
I don’t know - I’m weird about pictures of myself floating around on the internet. I ask because I may be doing a redesign soon, hopefully making this site skinnable and I may have to get rid of my ever-so-loved scrolling girl…
Stay up to date plugin - dang…I forgot, hold on, lemme find it.
That’s right, the wonderful Scriptygoddess (link goes directly to the plugin entry)
January 16th, 2005 at 2:24 pm
Well, now you got me, teli; I really haven’t been posting enough. Generally it’s because I’ve gotten so much work that I’m (nearly) overwhumped. But I do have about five posts half-written, so I’ll be posting those before too long.
Thanks to the link to S-Goddess; I take it you’re on 1.2.2 and it works, so …
January 16th, 2005 at 2:31 pm
I’ll be looking forward to it - I really do enjoy reading your blog - which reminds me, it’s definitely time for me to update my links list. It’s no where near complete.
Yeppers…surprisingly enough, none of my plugins were thrown out of whack when I updated, however, my w.bloggar stopped working due to an error in the xmlrpc file. Switching to an older version of the file fixed the problem, but I believe 4.00 (stable release) has a workaround for this problem now…okay, done with the wild tangent LOL