All This WordPress Hubbub

An entry by teli on 03/31/2005

I started to write a comment on BJ’s posting today on the trouble going on with WordPress, but it became so long I decided I should blog it.

If you haven’t heard yet, it’s been found out that Matt Mullenweg was covertly linking to hosting some 120,000+ shady content pages which were created for the sole purpose of bringing in Adsense revenue for high profit keywords. Matt allegedly admitted to only receiving a set fee and all Adsense revenue went to the owner of those pages. [ read all about it ]

I think the reason why so many people are upset about the situation is because it taints the idealistic view of WordPress. I know I personally held WordPress in very high regard, not just the software, but the purpose, the drive, the community.

My personal feelings have only changed slightly in light of recent events. I still hold WordPress the software in high regard and that won’t change, I still enjoy the community, but now I’m questioning the drive and motive.

I’m not mad at Matt. Open Source Software makers generally receive no love and even less donations, so I can definitely see the need for earning some money on the side. I can’t blame Matt for that - the man cannot live on building free software alone.

Another reason why I’m not so mad at Matt for doing what he did is because I get pissy when people screw with my time and my hard work (with not so much as a thank you), so I expect all the WordPress developers and contributors to be a little pissy when people are ungrateful or don’t give back to the community in some way.

I know plenty of people who remove any and all reference to WordPress from their site, don’t donate, and don’t help out in the support forums or build plugins/themes for WordPress - not even a thank you. That, in my eyes, is just as bad (or worse) than what Matt did.

Obviously the “dark side” was offering something a whole lot better than the “idealistic views of WordPress” side was. My main concern is - what’s really going on behind the development screen? It’s like there’s some dark underbelly of WordPress that I don’t know about and that’s what worries me.

I read somewhere that the developers don’t receive any portion of the donations and people are already figuring out ways to monetize WordPress for their own benefit, but what’s the extent of it all?

Regarding the implications of his actions on the search engines, I’ve known since the moment I discovered CSS that some of the nifty tricks we use to make our lives easier could be used to abuse SEs and lead to what’s considered “shady SEO practices”.

I certainly hope that the big G doesn’t drop WordPress.org because they have a wealth of information on their site that people need on a daily basis and wouldn’t find it w/o a web search…

I honestly hope this can be worked out. My personal feeling though is that Google won’t drop WP.org from the index. They may give Matt a very stern warning, but I don’t think they’d actually drop him and I don’t think the little powered by links will affect the rank of the linking site.

On another note: I really need to figure out how to get rid of this rel=”nofollow” crap from my comments section. I know, I know, it’s there for a reason - <sarcasm>my commenters are spammers and their links should be worthless or something</sarcasm>. If I ever decide to abandon my blog, I’ll be sure to turn it back on.

If anyone knows of a quick & painless (hopefully doesn’t make me think - or better yet, logs in and does it for me automagically because it’s wrapped up in a plugin) way to remove them, please let me know :)

# | Leave your comment | Filed in: Geekie Stuff, Mild Insanity

8 Responses to “All This WordPress Hubbub”

  1. Jason Stare Says:

    RE: the nofollow attribute.

    You can remove it using this method or use this plugin.

  2. teli Says:

    Thank you Jason…much much appreciated :D and apparently my prayers were answered cuz there’s a plugin!

  3. William Says:

    Interesting, is rel=nofollow on by default? It doesn’t show up for me and I would have to install a plugin to turn it ON, rather than off.

    Regarding the whole WP controversy… I don’t find too much wrong with what he did/is doing. It’s not like he’s plastering ads all over our blogs and the site. It was pretty inconspicuous until someone stumbled upon it. I’ll just pretend I didn’t see it :P

    (I am a spammer. I am a spammer. I am a spammer. I am a spammer. I am a spammer. ;))

  4. teli Says:

    I can’t believe you just spammed me you spammer :P

    Yeppers, WP 1.5 comes with the rel=”nofollow” attribute turned on by default. You may gotten some fluke WP install or something, but I’d double check the links left by your commenters and you may be surprised….you spammer

  5. William Says:

    Hmm it only added it for links posted in the actual comment, not for the person’s posted URL. Is this supposed to happen or is it supposed to be there for the person’s inputted URL also?

    And if you’re still looking, I found this: http://kimmo.suominen.com/sw/dofollow/

  6. teli Says:

    It’s supposed to be there for the person’s URL too…I downloaded the plugin Jason pointed out, but I’ve been too lazy to install it LOL.

    Lemme do that now before I forget…

  7. Paul Short Says:

    Maybe Matt will use z-index:100; to cover all this up!

    Sorry, couldn’t resist ;-)

  8. DianeV Says:

    Good post, Teli.

    Many of us feel a certain gratefulness towards Matt. Unfortunately, I don’t think he understands what a strong thing he did. The pages were duplicates (search engine spam) and not of much value, existing only to display adsense rather than providing value *and* displaying adsense; the links were hidden; luckily, Google didn’t also hit him hard on the Adsense issues. That would have been a whole other can of worms.

    Next, Google dropped wordpress.org’s PageRank to zero for a while. This is what they do with *really bad* spammers, and it doesn’t just go away easily. While WP’s PR was restored (at a speed I’ve never heard of), for some hours there, most WP blogs were linking to what Google terms a “bad neighborhood” — meaning that their rankings would also be lowered. See how this goes? So it isn’t just a little “experiment” gone wrong; it’s really an ethical issue. Unfortunately, grateful though I may be, I’m not sure Matt gets the seriousness of it all, but simply thinks of it as “noise” (his word, not mine).

    Unfortunately, the WordPress crew got tarnished a bit with the same brush.

    Lastly, can’t the three references in the WP1.5 files to nofollow just be removed? I’ll try that out soon.